|
Los Angeles Kings Hockey Results |
When Los Angeles Kings played as Road Favorite |
ATS Record: 39-26-4 |
SU Record: 39-26-4 |
O/U Record: 30-34-5 |
Sr No. |
Date |
Home |
Road |
Line |
Total |
FLML |
TotalML |
HS |
RS |
ATSwinner |
SUwinner |
O/U |
1 |
1998-01-04 |
EDMONTON |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5 |
-140 |
-130 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
T
|
2 |
1998-02-03 |
CALGARY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-150 |
-110 |
3 |
6 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
3 |
1998-03-16 |
SAN JOSE |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-140 |
100 |
2 |
1 |
SAN JOSE |
SAN JOSE |
U
|
4 |
1998-03-24 |
SAN JOSE |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-130 |
110 |
3 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
5 |
1998-03-28 |
CALGARY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-140 |
-110 |
5 |
2 |
CALGARY |
CALGARY |
O
|
6 |
1998-03-30 |
TORONTO |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-130 |
100 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
7 |
1998-04-15 |
VANCOUVER |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
6 |
-145 |
-130 |
0 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
8 |
1998-10-10 |
EDMONTON |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
115 |
-115 |
1 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
9 |
1998-10-12 |
VANCOUVER |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
6 |
115 |
120 |
4 |
2 |
VANCOUVER |
VANCOUVER |
T
|
10 |
1998-10-23 |
TAMPA BAY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
125 |
-110 |
3 |
2 |
TAMPA BAY |
TAMPA BAY |
T
|
11 |
1998-10-27 |
NY ISLANDERS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
105 |
-110 |
1 |
0 |
NY ISLANDERS |
NY ISLANDERS |
U
|
12 |
1999-10-02 |
NASHVILLE |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
115 |
105 |
0 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
13 |
1999-10-07 |
TAMPA BAY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
110 |
-125 |
2 |
5 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
14 |
1999-10-15 |
CALGARY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
120 |
-110 |
1 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
15 |
1999-10-30 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
120 |
-135 |
1 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
16 |
1999-12-11 |
MONTREAL |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
120 |
-130 |
2 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
17 |
2000-02-16 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
120 |
-150 |
1 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
18 |
2000-02-25 |
VANCOUVER |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
115 |
-120 |
2 |
5 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
19 |
2000-03-25 |
BOSTON |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
120 |
-110 |
4 |
4 |
TIE |
TIE |
O
|
20 |
2000-03-26 |
ATLANTA |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6 |
-110 |
-130 |
1 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
21 |
2000-10-09 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
240 |
-120 |
1 |
7 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
22 |
2000-10-17 |
NASHVILLE |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
105 |
-120 |
1 |
1 |
TIE |
TIE |
U
|
23 |
2000-10-31 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6 |
-120 |
100 |
4 |
1 |
COLUMBUS |
COLUMBUS |
U
|
24 |
2000-11-02 |
ATLANTA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
6 |
200 |
100 |
2 |
5 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
25 |
2000-11-05 |
NY ISLANDERS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
6 |
110 |
100 |
1 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
26 |
2000-11-26 |
BOSTON |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
130 |
-120 |
4 |
4 |
TIE |
TIE |
O
|
27 |
2000-12-03 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
6 |
110 |
100 |
4 |
0 |
ANAHEIM |
ANAHEIM |
U
|
28 |
2000-12-22 |
MINNESOTA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
135 |
100 |
4 |
3 |
MINNESOTA |
MINNESOTA |
O
|
29 |
2001-02-16 |
MINNESOTA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
115 |
100 |
0 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
30 |
2001-02-18 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
6 |
125 |
100 |
3 |
0 |
CHICAGO |
CHICAGO |
U
|
31 |
2001-03-01 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
100 |
100 |
2 |
2 |
TIE |
TIE |
U
|
32 |
2001-03-04 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
145 |
100 |
4 |
0 |
ANAHEIM |
ANAHEIM |
U
|
33 |
2001-04-07 |
CALGARY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
125 |
100 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
T
|
34 |
2001-10-23 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5 |
115 |
-110 |
1 |
7 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
35 |
2001-10-25 |
TAMPA BAY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
110 |
100 |
3 |
0 |
TAMPA BAY |
TAMPA BAY |
U
|
36 |
2001-10-26 |
FLORIDA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-115 |
100 |
3 |
2 |
FLORIDA |
FLORIDA |
U
|
37 |
2001-12-16 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5 |
-140 |
100 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
T
|
38 |
2002-01-21 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
4.5 |
-120 |
-120 |
2 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
39 |
2002-01-30 |
MINNESOTA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
4.5 |
-115 |
-120 |
0 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
40 |
2002-02-26 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5 |
115 |
100 |
1 |
5 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
41 |
2002-02-27 |
PITTSBURGH |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-145 |
100 |
4 |
5 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
42 |
2002-03-07 |
NASHVILLE |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
4.5 |
-150 |
-120 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
43 |
2002-03-30 |
CALGARY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
4.5 |
-125 |
-120 |
5 |
3 |
CALGARY |
CALGARY |
O
|
44 |
2002-10-16 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5 |
-130 |
-130 |
2 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
45 |
2002-10-27 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-110 |
110 |
5 |
1 |
COLUMBUS |
COLUMBUS |
O
|
46 |
2002-10-29 |
ATLANTA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
6 |
140 |
-130 |
0 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
47 |
2002-12-10 |
NASHVILLE |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5 |
100 |
100 |
0 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
48 |
2002-12-15 |
PHOENIX |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-135 |
110 |
2 |
1 |
PHOENIX |
PHOENIX |
U
|
49 |
2003-02-25 |
PITTSBURGH |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5 |
-160 |
-130 |
3 |
5 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
50 |
2003-02-27 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-135 |
-110 |
3 |
1 |
COLUMBUS |
COLUMBUS |
U
|
51 |
2003-10-10 |
PITTSBURGH |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-135 |
120 |
0 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
52 |
2003-11-05 |
FLORIDA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
4.5 |
-130 |
-135 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
53 |
2003-12-10 |
ATLANTA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-135 |
100 |
4 |
3 |
ATLANTA |
ATLANTA |
O
|
54 |
2004-01-16 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.50 |
4.5 |
-140 |
-120 |
3 |
2 |
COLUMBUS |
COLUMBUS |
O
|
55 |
2004-01-18 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
0.50 |
4.5 |
-140 |
-120 |
1 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
56 |
2004-03-10 |
PHOENIX |
LOS ANGELES |
0.50 |
5 |
-110 |
-130 |
1 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
57 |
2005-11-11 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6.5 |
135 |
-155 |
2 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U |
58 |
2005-11-13 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6 |
155 |
-175 |
2 |
8 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O |
59 |
2005-11-15 |
NASHVILLE |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
6 |
-105 |
-115 |
3 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
NASHVILLE |
U |
60 |
2005-11-22 |
ST LOUIS |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6 |
180 |
-220 |
3 |
6 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O |
61 |
2005-11-24 |
NASHVILLE |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6 |
100 |
-120 |
4 |
3 |
NASHVILLE |
NASHVILLE |
O |
62 |
2005-11-30 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6.5 |
135 |
-155 |
3 |
2 |
CHICAGO |
CHICAGO |
U |
63 |
2006-01-09 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6 |
100 |
-120 |
6 |
2 |
ANAHEIM |
ANAHEIM |
O |
64 |
2006-01-12 |
BOSTON |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6.5 |
115 |
-135 |
0 |
6 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U |
65 |
2006-02-02 |
PHOENIX |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6.5 |
105 |
-125 |
2 |
1 |
PHOENIX |
PHOENIX |
U |
66 |
2006-02-08 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6.5 |
100 |
-120 |
7 |
4 |
COLUMBUS |
COLUMBUS |
O |
67 |
2006-03-11 |
ST LOUIS |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6.5 |
145 |
-165 |
1 |
2 |
ST LOUIS |
LOS ANGELES |
U |
68 |
2006-11-04 |
PHOENIX |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
6 |
-105 |
-115 |
6 |
4 |
PHOENIX |
PHOENIX |
O |
69 |
2006-12-21 |
ST LOUIS |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6 |
-105 |
-115 |
5 |
2 |
ST LOUIS |
ST LOUIS |
O |
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
Copyright© 2004, 2005 www.atsstats.com all rights reserved |
|
|